[Nameplate] Fair ~ 47°F  
High: 83°F
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Forget Rush, usher in Meghan

Posted Friday, July 3, 2009, at 6:21 PM

I use Twitter...a lot. I like to follow interesting and funny people. One of those people I follow is the daughter of Arizona Senator and former Presidential Candidate John McCain. That is right, I follow Meghan McCain. Now, her and I disagree on quite a few things on the political spectrum, but that is not the reason I followed her. I followed her on Twitter, quite frankly, because she is hot. Oh, and also, because she is brilliant. (Good save!)

The more I followed her, the more of her materials I read, and it got me thinking. Why is she a Republican? I think it is the core, "Reagan" values that make Ms. McCain a member of the GOP. Those values are, and Republicans feel free to comment, limited government, pro-gun, and anti-taxes. On those issues, she fits in step with the Republican mindset. It is her social stances that get her into trouble with "Republican Leaders."

Ms. McCain is sympathetic to the gay-rights movement in this country. I guess sympathetic is an understatement. Staunch supporter is a better fit. To quote Ms. McCain from her blog on "The Daily Beast,": "I was so honored to be asked to pose for the NOH8 campaign. I am a proud member of the Republican Party and a proud supporter of marriage equality. I especially love the incorporation of the little elephant with his tusks duct-taped in the photograph. Marriage equality is not just a Democrat or Republican issue, it is a human one."

Not only does she support that cause, but she is also all about an honest and open talk of sex. Again, quoting Ms. McCain's blog: "Here's what I've never understood about the party (the GOP): its resistance to discussing better access to birth control. As a Republican, I am pro-life. But using birth control and having an abortion are not the same at all. Actually, the best way to prevent abortions is to educate people about birth control and make it widely and easily accessible. True, abstinence is the only way to fully prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Still, the problem with abstinence-only education is that it does not make teenagers and young adults more knowledgeable about all the issues they face if or when they have sex--physically and emotionally." Now, what? That is something you do not hear from a Republican or a Conservative.

*shakes head* I am so confused. How can a smart, funny, attractive, young lady be a Republican? Republicans are for old prunes like Rush Limbaugh or Pat Robertson, not for young people. Eh, whatever.

At any rate, she has a different viewpoint on social issues than the "typical Republican." She even went as far as to say she was "pro-sex" on the hit TV show "The Colbert Report." I bet Jerry Falwell rolled over in his grave.

I think any political observer would say the Republican Party is in disarray and needs leadership. Right now, there are too many cooks like Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, and even the anorexic Ann Coulter (just kidding) who attack GOP Chairman Michael Steele for being too moderate or too soft on President Obama. Whatever, the Republicans need to stop bickering and get behind a new voice. The voice of the future, not the past. Right now, it looks like Meghan McCain has that voice.

What is more is that she is not afraid to defend her views no matter who asks. I think her on-going feud with Ann Coulter and other staunch Conservatives solidifies that. Again, quoting her blog: "I find her (Coulter) offensive, radical, insulting, and confusing all at the same time." This great quality is something she inherited from her father. I think the Arizona maverick Senator formed another maverick, Republicans, so you better get used to it.

Look, the point being made is Meghan McCain is speaking what should be the future of the Republican Party. Sure, keep your anti-government, anti-woman, "I hate paying taxes" ideals, but maybe if the GOP was more open on social issues, they may be really competitive in next year's Congressional Elections or even give President Obama a fair competitor in 2012. Until Ms. McCain's voice is heeded, Republicans will remain in disarray for at least three more Presidential Elections. Republicans have President George W. Bush to thank for that. Just a thought...


Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

I hate to break it to you, but there are A LOT of Republicans who are socially different than the current establishment. I've been a Republican my whole life, but I support all human equality rights, including gay marriage. I also fully support legalizing marijuana. I am very much in support of whatever consenting adults want to do in their own homes. I'm very much a small government and lower taxes and type person, and also VERY anti nanny government.

The direction my party has taken in the last 10 years is just awful and they really need to rethink the goals and to also push away from such control by the religious right. The party is antagonizing people by giving over control to religion and neocons.

I want my party back!! Less gov't involvement in our lives and wallets!

And just so you know, I happen to know a lot of Republicans who think like I do. We just don't get the attention. FYI, I'm 38.

-- Posted by KristineAz on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, at 8:06 PM

It's not the party faithful that win elections. It wasn't the liberal Democrats that elected Obama, and neither was it the conservative Republicans that elected George W. Bush twice. Even Ronald Reagan would not have been elected without the "Reagan Democrats."

It's the folks in the middle that decide.

People like Colin Powell, who recently said,

"I'm a little concerned," former Secretary of State Colin Powell says. "I'm concerned at the number of programs that are being presented, the bills associated with these programs and the additional government that will be needed to execute them."

Powell also seems to sound a note of warning to the young president.

"I think one of the cautions that has to be given to the president -- and I've talked to some of his people about this -- is that you can't have so many things on the table that you can't absorb it all. And we can't pay for it all."

I realize that Powell is a Republican, but so was Arlen Spector at one time, now Spector is a Democrat. Both of this guys are really third way people, more independent than party faithful.

Specter's party switch was a matter of survival, because he knew he would have a hard time in the Republican primary. It really doesn't mean that he has changed his views on any issues, or that he will necessarily change his votes on them, either.

Also, he must be feeling pretty slighted since he was stripped of all of his seniority. That move was not just embarassing to Specter, but to Harry Reid as well, since Reid made the promise only to have his own caucus revoke it. Specter's re-election is dependent upon his own personality more than his party, just like Leiberman's was.

I.e., appeal to the independent voters.

It is these people in the middle that decide the elections. You get their votes, with promises of economic recovery like Obama did, or promises of continued national security like Bush 42 did, then you win elections.

If I were a Democratic strategist working for the 2010 elections, I would pay some attention to Colin Powell's remarks. Far more attention to Colin Powell and others you can find in the middle, than I would to a Meghan McCain or a Rush Limbaugh, both of whom are really just part of what Chris Matthews likes to call the "Hardball Sideshow."

In mid-term elections, historically, the party in power tends to lose support. In looking at things the way they are now, with the midterms a little over a year away, there is little to make this voter think that things will be much different for 2010. The Democrats hold such strong majorities in both houses that they really have no way to go but down. They will lose their filibuster proof majority in the Senate and lose some seats in the House.

Those very voters who were promised economic recovery are now beginning to wonder where it is. So far, Obama's stimulus plan hasn't stimulated much of anything except the federal deficit, and, he is now moving on to healthcare, which is guaranteed to swell the federal deficit even further beyond its already historic proportions.

He needs to pay heed to Colin's remarks above, or face the possibility of being another one term Democrat like Jimmy Carter. A good guy, who really couldn't get much done.

-- Posted by Lil' Hahn on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, at 7:49 AM

i think what he's trying to say is that times are changing, especially for the republican party. it's changed started when they nominated mccain instead of romney for president.

-- Posted by hitman648 on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, at 10:31 AM

If you look through history, you'll see that there is no such thing as a true conservative Republican anymore at all. Everyone who claims to be one is sadly delusional because this country has been leaning left(er) and left(er) since President Lincoln was in office.

He has become known as the "Progenitor of Totalitarianism" in TRUE conservative circles -- and by conservative, I mean the only true conservatives left in the country are those who are staunch 10th Amendment people (states' rights trump federal), 2nd Amendment people (keep and bear arms against the government), and absolute First Amendment people who truly believe in free speech and assembly, not just the lip service of it.

People who truly believe that you can say whatever you want and who DO NOT TRY to stifle opposing views because they are uncomfortable or unwanted. True Free Speech means that we can all say exactly what we want and that NO ONE has the right to squelch that.

Wake up, please! The citizens (most of them) of this nation have been asleep for more than a century. If the "middle thinkers" don't begin to realize what is happening, the politicians and those who control what goes on in this country by the inside of their billfolds, will make paupers of us all -- and in the name of "trusting the government." -- no more frightening a concept has ever been put forward.

-- Posted by Greenee on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, at 10:46 AM

Interesting article. I love it. The sad thing is that the far left and far right do their best to keep us from meeting in the middle.

Republicans and Democrats both have a lot of middle of the road people who struggle with their parties views.

Unfortunately, politics seems to be a pendelum. Republicans fell asleep at the wheel, so now Democrats are going to over legislate to make up for it. Makes both parties like inept.

-- Posted by GCC on Wed, Jul 8, 2009, at 9:07 AM

I would suggest you watch real time with bill mahr, tonight. Ms McCain is on it and doesn't come across as the sharpest knife in the drawer.

-- Posted by chevygleen on Fri, Jul 10, 2009, at 6:16 PM

Wow!

Drew, are you actually telling us who will give us (Republicans and/or Conservatives) a "better" direction? This little cutie that you are infatuated with and has Liberal views on most subjects and is merely "registered" as a Republican?

Just how shameless are you? We don't agree with your ideologies as a Democrat, so you try and persuade us to listen to a Liberal in Republican clothing? I think there is a reason that Rush and Hannity have the following that they do... they are vocalizing what we believe. Sorry, this little what's her name is not the vocalization of our beliefs/standards. The direction that the Republican party needs to go is to it's foundations. It has been leaning more and more moderate in hopes of collecting followers of the Democrat party. The irony is that all it needs to do is foundational values and let the people see the difference. Choosing to follow the GOP is not as easy when the two parties are so similar and the GOP is the one changing TO the Democrat ideologies as though to give them credence.

So I ask, how is your little twitter girl such a good voice for the direction of the Republican party?

-- Posted by jbann on Sun, Jul 12, 2009, at 8:07 PM

jbann- Don't be so naive. Rush and Hannity or no more Republican than a middle of the road Republican. As for popularity, you whine and complain long enough you will surely find an audience. I would be curious to what either actually does other than stir the pot. They are just like Al Franken...just from the opposite spectrum. At least Franken put his money where his enormous mouth is and ran for office(then again..that may not be a good thing).

-- Posted by GCC on Sun, Jul 12, 2009, at 11:23 PM

I guess I am naive. What you are saying is that Rush and Hannity are the SAME as twitter girl? Your man Drew is stating otherwise. How naive of he and I. You call them pot stirrers. The pot needs to be stirred. When people in Govt do not follow the will of the people, the town crier needs to let everyone know. Although I find it interesting that Rush and Hannity are pot stirrers and Miss twitter is left alone. Or am I just assuming here that you were only talking about the 3 men?

PS: What is your political affiliation? You always seem to be in the middle of the road. Your comments suggest that you are neither Dem or Rep but above. Just curious.

-- Posted by jbann on Mon, Jul 13, 2009, at 8:16 AM

Vice President for $100 please.

What? Where did that come from? I don't remember talking about the VP. I think you left something out of your posting... maybe the first part of the thought?

So, Rush found himself addicted to pain meds after surgery... and overcame it. Sounds like he was pretty tough to cowboy up. He has his moments of stupidity like anyone else, but for the most part, he is correct and DOES speak more like a Republican than Miss twitter. Which was the main subject but feel free to talk about the VP, it's not my blog.

-- Posted by jbann on Mon, Jul 13, 2009, at 7:30 PM

And yet you have failed to make any real point about either of your "topics"... Please re-read the blog and try over.

-- Posted by jbann on Tue, Jul 14, 2009, at 8:27 AM

Drew,

You are wrong on so many points. The main one being the premise that republicans are closed minded and can be put into a tidy little box.

The bottom line is, republicans believe in freedom and liberals don't (except the right for abortion).

Another point that you have spent an article defending is that the party needs one single voice. Who says that republicans, democrats or independents need one voice.

I guess it is just the liberals way to put a label on someone , point a finger and label.

Most republicans I know are equally disgusted with this government and the spending of the last administration.

Believe me, your "progressive liberal" group can have Ms. McCain. She doesn't seem to speak for anyone, but just speaks.

-- Posted by cow rancher on Fri, Jul 17, 2009, at 2:51 PM

Spoken well. Opened a big can of worms for discussion on here. Had humor and information. Kudos...........

-- Posted by gccitizen on Sun, Jul 19, 2009, at 6:15 PM

Okay,so Drew....are you saying you're leaning toward becoming a Libertarian? http://www.lp.org/platform Read and think about it.Drew could be Greene County's answer to Glenn Beck!!

-- Posted by Mr. F on Sat, Aug 1, 2009, at 9:42 AM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


The Point
Drew Landry
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Hot topics
The Grand Finale
(8 ~ 11:53 AM, Aug 11)

For The Dads
(1 ~ 12:13 PM, Jun 19)

The Once and Future Subject
(49 ~ 5:59 AM, Jun 15)

Personal Story
(6 ~ 9:48 AM, Jun 1)

Mom's Day
(3 ~ 8:27 AM, Jun 1)