High: 66°F ~ Low: 42°F
Monday, Mar. 10, 2014
Trying to make sense of the 'corn road' and school board bid snafuPosted Thursday, April 29, 2010, at 1:59 PM
It's been an eventful week in the newsroom and elsewhere.
Many questions were raised in two particular stories that I covered.
First, we had a county road in Fairplay Township reported to be planted in corn -- an obvious encroachment on county property that has been taking place for "several" years, according to word that was received by the Greene County Commissioners on Monday morning.
Now why does this not surprise me too much?
It was kind of funny at the onset, but it's rather disturbing when you consider that this particular -- hardly-maintained county dirt road -- has actually been planted in corn and possibly other grain crops several times before.
Current tenants to the land is Cornelius Farms from Daviess County.
It is supposed to be on a county map somewhere as a road, but I'm told that officials haven't been able to locate it yet.
The commissioners have apparently never taken formal action to officially close the road, so it remains a county road, not an extension to some contracted farmer's field.
The commissioners appeared surprised when a not-to-happy farming neighbor -- Arnold Graves -- brought the matter to their attention in a public meeting.
You'd think someone would have noticed or at least asked a few questions before the ground was plowed and seed dropped in the ground for another year.
One commissioner kind of blew it all off and questioned what can be done about the situation since the planting already had been done.
What kind of logic is that?
On the same day, a story surfaced about an alleged and forthcoming "payoff" by the Bloomfield School District to a contractor, who's low bid was shunned on a house demolition project near the school campus.
We confirmed that talks between an attorney for the school and legal counsel for a Linton businessman are under way to settle a rather sticky situation.
The businessman was asked to figure up his anticipated profit margin on a job that he never won a contract for. He says the school wants to "compensate" him in that amount to avert a future lawsuit.
That figure exceeds $1,000.
We understand that the cash to pay the rejected low bidder is coming from insurance funds, but that's still money that will come back to bite the taxpayers when the insurance company hikes the school district's premium because of this claim -- to cover its backside.
The story actually dates back to February, when the bids or quotes were opened by the school board.
All of the bids were taken under advisement initially.
The next month -- after negotiating a price with the next lowest bidder -- Riley Terrell Lawn Service -- the board awarded the contract to tear down five vacant homes that will be used for future school projects.
It seems the school board didn't like the low bid from a Linton-based land clearing business, which was more than $1,500 under the next lowest quote.
There was even talk among the board members that a reason for seeking another bid/quote was that the low bidder wasn't a local company.
Is Linton not local when it comes to proximity to Bloomfield?
I know the good old White River is wide in places and runs deep, but come on, a Linton business has to be regarded as local, if the county is ever going to prosper.
Let's understand that the board didn't even have to bid the demolition project out legally -- because it fell under a $25,000 threshold.
But when it was carried out by a sealed bid, you would have thought it would have been handled different -- rather than authorizing the superintendent to simply negotiate a better price.
The superintendent did just that.
He came back at the March meeting with a price that was $1 less than the lower bidder on both the base and alternate bids.
I can tell you the superintendent followed the wishes of the majority of the board, who voted 6-1 to accept the negotiated price.
Details of the transaction could surface at the school board's regular meeting on Thursday night.
There are plenty of lessons to be learned here and they are the kind of lessons you won't find in a school book.
Was the action legal? Yes, it was.
Was the action ethical? That's where the question marks start popping up.
Was the action a smart way to do business in a small community? Definitely not.
Nick is the assistant editor for the Greene County Daily World. He can be reached by telephone at 847-4487 or by e-mail at email@example.com.
Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]
- Blog RSS feed
- Comments RSS feed
- Send email to By Nick Schneider, Co-Editor
Hot topicsThere's a lot to learn from eagles
(1 ~ 2:52 PM, Mar 5)
County school districts should consider consolidation
Husbands, love your wives; wives, love your husband
Roe vs. Wade is simply the wrong choice
A trip down a snowy memory lane