|
|
|
|
Partly Cloudy ~ High: 85°F ~ Low: 67°F Thursday, June 20, 2013 |
|
Elimination of cursive penmanship instruction is a step back for educationPosted Monday, July 11, 2011, at 2:05 PM
Writing in cursive may soon be a thing of the past.
All the fancy loops and flowing curves of cursive handwriting, also known as longhand or script, is disappearing from classrooms as the Indiana Department of Education announced this month that its teachers will no longer spend time teaching cursive. Instead, they will teach keyboarding proficiency. It looks like cursive handwriting is going away just like ink wells and chalkboards did a few years back. What a shame and disappointment. Indiana may be at the tip of a much larger trend. The new national common core standards for English do not require schools to teach cursive writing, although schools can teach longhand if they want to. Nationwide, 41 states have already adopted the core curriculum. In general, I've supported the much needed educational reforms passed by the recent session of the General Assembly. But to do away with the teaching of cursive handwriting is a mistake in my humble opinion. Some classroom teachers say a lack of time in the school day -- and too much to teach -- contributes to the drop in penmanship lessons. I'm not sure I agree wholeheartedly with that statement, but do recognize that new state reforms will and have already put new strains on the things that classroom teachers are expected to do. To top it off, they will be evaluated on how well their students do on standardized testing, so I understand why educators want to teach and drill students for the important test assessments. Now understand, my own personal cursive handwriting is hardly a work of art or an example of the way a young student ought to emerge from 12 years of public school instruction. I vividly remember going to the blackboard at St. Paul Grade School in my primary years and carefully writing my alphabet in cursive to the watchful eye of our nun teacher who made sure every loop and curve was etched to perfection. If it wasn't, we did it again and again until we got it right and to her approval. Today, my handwriting on many days resembles the non-decipherable scribbling of a medical doctor. I find it amusing that when I was in high school, I was selected to write students names into an English teacher's grade book because of my good penmanship. Now, if you see my handwriting, you would wonder what that teacher was thinking to select me. I tease those who comment on my "bad" handwriting that my reporter's notes are written that way in my own personal secret code so no one is able to "steal" my news thoughts and observations. In general, cursive handwriting is a thing of beauty -- almost an art. Have you seen a handwritten copy of the Declaration of Independence? The cursive handwriting is very impressive. Have you went to the Greene County Courthouse in Bloomfield and visited the Greene County Recorder's office and viewed a handwritten deed record from years ago and see how beautiful the handwriting was? It appears classic penmanship will be left behind as preparation for state assessment tests dominate classroom times. Some will claim the rise of the Internet, combined with a push to ensure that children are technologically literate, for rendering delicate handwriting an art of yesteryear. I'm wondering if you think that's a good thing for all those future thank-you notes and other correspondence where cursive writing is expected. Emphasis in U.S. schools has shifted from the beauty of handwriting, to writing efficiently and there is nothing wrong with stressing effective and efficient handwriting. In Florida, handwriting was reinstated into state's school standards in 2006, after educators became concerned that it was slipping away from classrooms. According to state guidelines, third graders must begin learning cursive, fourth graders must have legible writing and fifth graders must be fluent in the script. Indiana should take note and re-consider its decision. Nick is the assistant editor for the Greene County Daily World. He can be contacted by telephone at 847-4487 or by email at schneider.nick@gmail.com . Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Extra, Extra! ![]() - Archives - Blog RSS feed - Comments RSS feed - Send email to By Nick Schneider, Assistant Editor - Login Hot topics Ride Solution offers an alternative when the gas pump prices get you down(0 ~ 1:11 PM, Jun 17)
Carnegie Center has a lot to offer
Much can be learned from Neve's birthday party
Thanks to all of our mothers
Volunteer firefighters deserve our praise
|
KateGladstone = spam
This just seems silly to me.
There are abundant reasons to expose children to Latin as well. Learning word origins increaes their vocabulary and as English is a Latin based language, being exposed to Latin would make students more proficient in English spelling and vocabulary. But it is not taught, except in large schools, and although students would most likely benefit from taking it, are they harmed by not taking it???
In 10 years time, people won't be able to function without proficient keyboarding skills. The current generation doesn't function without texting and Facebook and they will bring those 'social networking' skills to the workplace with them when they get there. Cursive writing take a long time to learn, significant practing, and even then is often far from legible.
My child, an exceptional student, would often get poor grades in 3rd/4th grade because his loops weren't completely closed or the tails of his letters didn't go all the way down to the line and poor handwriting meant the answer was incorrect. Ironically, often the grade the teacher put on the page was not written properly. Is consuming time for this skill going to benefit student somehow? The only, small arguement that could potentially be made is that it teaches attention to detail.
Now if focus is going to be removed from the STEM subjects, then that is an argument worth making. However maybe we need to teach our students the basics when they're young. And even if substantial time is spent on reading...they have to be reading some type of content...who's to say that they won't be reading articles on science or history or health.
I am also a half and half writer most of the time. I can't remember the last time I wrote a capital F or J or Z in cursive. But if cursive writing fades away, I for one won't miss trying to discern what other people scribbled on a page. I'd much rather read something that has been neatly typed. And some people will take the time to learn caligraphy and keep the fancy writing alive, even if it only appears on graduation and wedding invitations.
The State of Indiana is really making homeschooling your own children look a whole lot better! I do not blame the teachers for this, they have to follow whatever rules are handed down, from week to week I blame the rule maker, Tony Bennet! and Gov Daniels! I just wonder, how much more are the residents of Indiana going to take from him! this is your children!!! he has effected our jobs, our income, our roads, now our children!!!
I think the kids need to know how to write and read cursive! Just because cursive is taught doesn't mean they will have to use it daily. I still write in cursive most of the time and did throughout college. I can't imagine in the future my kid not being able to read my writing because they weren't taught it! Sad...
Here begins the collatoral damage of the education reforms. It is just the beginning.
Nick fails to mention that the new view on handwriting is two/fold and has little to nothing to do with teachers.
First, reading is being pushed to the forefront(which is good). The problem is schools will be required to spend 90 uninterrupted minutes teaching reading(and no it cannot be free read). This is the tip of the iceberg and applies to all students. The next comes in the form of two additional tiers for the struggling reader. The 2nd tier is an additional 30 minutes and is designed to hit the 15% or so that need more. Then there is a third tier that will also be 30 minutes long for the really weak readers. Potentially 150 minutes of school could be used for reading. How many hours are in the school day??? Hmmm...
The second part to this is that they rephrased the standards to mention keyboarding...not cursive as a skill needed. Within all these reforms schools are expected to administer standardized tests by computer(the date is in debate since all students in any particular grade are supposed to take it at the same time...and most schools simply don't have the computers.)
Here are some of the additional things that will take a hit as well. Science, Social Studies, and Health at the elementary level. The standards in Science have been dummied down significantly and time constraints will force anything that is not a testing area for that year to the back.
Don't worry education is a pendelum swinging back and forth...one day some politician will get into office and do something about all these children who aren't being taught Social Studies, Science, Health, and Handwriting. DARN TEACHERS...why can't they just teach like they did back in my time(I almost have dejavu writing that...sounds strangely familiar).
I wish schools had working computer labs in their buildings and/or even working computers in the classroom to use to teach keyboarding. I can dream, but I am just extremely thankful that my children's school was able to keep almost all of their teachers with the budget cuts. The computers will come.......someday!
Ms. Gladstone, might I suggest a website rebuild? There are several incredible site designers here locally. That aside,cursive writing is an incredible skill. It is so sad to see this go but our society is changing....not always for the better. The art of writing seems to be taking the same hit that all the arts are taking...very sad.
Wow! My son's 3rd grade teacher mentioned this to me at the end of the year. I write in what I would call "half and half", half cursive, half print. It seems very strange to just do away with teaching it, though. I wonder if eventually they will take off the line of "signature" on forms, contracts, etc. that have a place for both your printed name and your signature.
Handwriting matters ... But does cursive matter?
Research shows: the fastest and most legible handwriters avoid cursive. They join only some letters, not all of them: making the easiest joins, skipping the rest, and using print-like shapes for those letters whose cursive and printed shapes disagree. (Citation on request.)
Reading cursive still matters -- this takes just 30 to 60 minutes to learn, and can be taught to a five- or six-year-old if the child knows how to read. The value of reading cursive is therefore no justification for writing it.
Remember, too: whatever your elementary school teacher may have been told by her elementary school teacher, cursive signatures have no special legal validity over signatures written in any other way. (Don't take my word for this: talk to any attorney.)
Kate Gladstone -- CEO, Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works
Director, the World Handwriting Contest
Co-Designer, BETTER LETTERS handwriting trainer app for iPhone/iPad
http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com