Civil wrongful death suit filed in 2008 railroad crossing fatality

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Nearly two years after the death of a 6-year-old boy who suffered severe head trauma in a vehicle-train accident near Vicksburg, his parents have filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in Greene Superior Court.

The 15-page complaint was filed Feb. 12 by Erica Harmon and Seath Stevenson, of Linton, as natural parents and guardians of Christopher Logan Stevenson against railroad engineer Jessie Kaufman, of Shelburn; Indiana Railroad Company; the Greene County Board of Commissioners; the Greene County Council and Fernando Perez, the young boy's natural father.

The 12-count suit seeks damages against the defendants in an amount that will "fairly compensate the plaintiffs for injuries, losses, expenses and for all other relief which is just and proper," according to court documents filed by Sullivan attorney Jeff Johnson.

No court date has been set in the case.

Stevenson, of Linton, died Feb. 21, 2008 in the intensive care unit at Riley Children's Hospital. He was a kindergarten student at Linton-Stockton Elementary School.

Christopher was a backseat passenger in a Jeep Grand Cherokee, driven by 25-year-old Seath Stevenson, of Linton, that collided with an Indiana Railroad Company locomotive at a crossing on County Road 400 North, approximately half a mile west of State Road 59 near Vicksburg on Feb. 15, 2008.

Stevenson, along with his fiancée, Erica Harmon, 22, of Linton and their 18-month-old son, Lucas Stevenson, were all treated and released at Greene County General Hospital in Linton for minor injuries after the accident.

The crossing was marked by railroad crossing signs and two stop signs, but was not equipped with any kind of electronic flashing lights, bells or crossing arms, according to Indiana State Police Sgt. Curt Durnil.

The investigation revealed the Jeep Cherokee was traveling westbound from SR 59 approaching the railroad crossing and for unknown reasons, the vehicle crossed over the railroad tracks as the southbound Indiana Railroad Train approached. The Jeep was then struck in the right rear quarter panel by the southbound train.

The collision sent the Jeep into a spin, ultimately coming to rest on the southwest edge of the railroad crossing, according to Durnil.

The railroad engineer was cleared of any wrongdoing by investigators, Durnil added.

Count 1 of the lawsuit against Kaufman and Indiana Railroad Company, based in Indianapolis, cites personal damages caused in the wreck.

The suit alleges that Kaufman and IRC were negligent because they failed to provide proper audible warnings, failed to exercise care in the operation of Train No. 6017 and failed to operate the train at a safe and reasonable speed.

Count 2 alleges that the young boy's death was a direct and a proximate result of Kaufman and IRC negligent acts or omissions; Harmon suffered loss of companionship of her son; the mother incurred health care, hospitalization as well as funeral and burial expenses; Harmon also has incurred psychiatric and psychological counseling expenses as a result of her son's death.

Count 3 seeks relief for damages against Kaufman and IRC for injury to her surviving son, Lucas.

Court 4 seeks relief from Jesse Kaufman and IRC for personal injuries to her son, Lucas Stevenson, for property damage, severe and personal permanent injuries; as well as severe and permanent emotional, mental and psychological expenses current and in the future.

Count 5 seeks damages on behalf of Seath Stevenson against Kaufman and IRC.

Count 6 seeks damages for personal injuries of Erica Harmon and Stevenson against Kaufman and IRC.

Counts 7 and 8 seek damages by Erica Harmon against the Greene County Commissioners and County Council because they make the decisions on the conditions of county roads.

Their alleged "inaction" results in the wrongful death of Harmon's young son, according to the suit.

The suit states, "numerous unreasonably dangerous conditions" existed in, on and around railroad crossings, including:

* The lack of visibility of oncoming trains from the base of County Road 400N caused by the large growth of trees and high brush.

* The lack of railroad crossing gates or arms.

* The lack of sufficient railroad crossing lights.

* The lack of sufficient audible warning devices.

* The unreasonable steep grade of the incline on both sides of the rail crossing.

The suit alleges that the commissioners and the county council members "knew or should have known" of the dangerous conditions because many residents had reported them to various county officials and employees. The suit also alleges there had been "near collisions" and dangerous incidents at this crossing.

The suit states that the commissioners and the council failed to enact or carry out sufficient, reasonable steps to eliminate, correct or otherwise alleviate the dangerous conditions.

Counts 9 and 10 seek relief from the commissioners and the council pertaining to injury to Lance Stevenson.

Count 11 against the commissioners and council seeks damages on behalf of Seath Stevenson for personal injuries to Lance Stevenson.

Count 12, also against the commissioners and council, seeks relief on behalf of Erica Harmon and Seath Stevenson for personal injuries and expenses.

Defendant Perez was named in the action to answer to his interest in Harmon's claims arising out of the wrongful death of Christopher Perez as cited in Counts 2 and 8.

After the wreck, former Greene County Council member Teddi Harmon and great-grandmother of the accident victim appealed to the county commissioners on several occasions to look at the steep grades on three railroad crossings on County Roads 400N, 450N and 500N -- all located west of State Road 59.

Last July, Harmon told the commissioners there is a 10-feet grade on County Road 400N and a steeper 15-feet grade on County Road 500N.

"When you go over the grade, all you see is the sky," Harmon said.

Teddi Harmon was also successful in getting the attention of Indiana Department of Transportation officials who have the installation of LCD flasher and cross arms on the rail crossings on County Road 400, County Road 450 and County Road 500.

At the time of the accident, none of the three intersections had crossing arms or warning lights.

The work was contracted by Indiana Railroad Company.

She said the lights and cross arms is one phase of what she would like to see done to improve the safety at those three rail crossing sites.

"Next is to work with the state and the railroad and the commissioners to change the grade level of the road," she said.

Harmon's petition to the commissioners offered two options to make the crossings safer.

* Lower the railroad tracks to lower the roadway level.

* Change the incline and the grade of the road to where there is at least a school bus length on both sides of the track for vehicles to stop and to enable people to look for trains or automobiles coming.

Comments
View 18 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I know this was a major loss to the family. But personally knowing Mr. Kaufman for several years now and working with him he is not the type of person who neglects his job nor would he want to cause harm of this sort. He had a hard enough time dealing with it then now having to deal with it again?? Come on now. So why drag him back into all this. He was cleared he did precisely what he was trained to do at a railroad crossing.

    -- Posted by craftsman798 on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 3:31 PM
  • What happened to Stop, Look, and Listen a good rule to live by.

    -- Posted by fatty66 on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 3:47 PM
  • I really feel for them all, but the little boy is gone and there is nothing that can be done. No money will make it right. We should all learn from this that if you cannot see down the tracks, we need to roll down the windows and turn down the radio, because I live several blocks from a track and you can surely hear them "a mile away". (Or nearly that.) I do feel, however, that she is right in saying some of these tracks need those guard arms to come down and force people to wait for the train. Losing a life isn't worth the few minutes you'd save. God Bless.

    -- Posted by feelinyounglookinold on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 3:51 PM
  • Face it, It's a sue, sue world. What % of fault does the driver of the jeep take here. Common sense tells us that when you have train tracks there could very well be a train. STOP. You can do this, That poor engineer is totally helpless when you pull in front of him.

    -- Posted by dock47459 on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 5:15 PM
  • until you operate a train you have no idea how many people neglect to stop look and listen. Standard rule for any train engineer is two long blast of the horn one short and one long through the crossing until your train blocks the crossing. Like you said dock you can stop a train on a dime its metal on metal even when you do put the train into emergency mode to try and stop.

    -- Posted by craftsman798 on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 5:30 PM
  • I do feel bad for all of them but i see no justice in this case. The vehicle was struck in the rear not the front. It had to of crossed without looking. The stop signs are there for a reason. If you stop and look, there really isnt a need for any other precautions. Same concept as any turn you make, at any given moment. You dont drive somewhere untill your safe! Not paying attention or being lazy can cost you dearly! Its very sad that this family had to go through this.

    -- Posted by BadSpellerrr on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 5:30 PM
  • A word of experience. My 18 month old cousin was killed by a lady driving past my uncle's house. It was on the main highway in a small town in NY state. She wasn't speeding, drunk, or high. She did nothing wrong. She wasn't at fault. Little Nicky was a mischievious toddler who took advantage of the fact his mother turned her back for just a moment to attend one the other 3 children and his daddy was under a truck helping a friend do repairs. By the time my uncle noticed Nicky running toward the road, it was too late to save him. He ran, he called for Nicky to stop. But it was too late. Nicky died shortly later in the ER.

    My uncle's wife, Becky, sued the woman for negligent homicide or wrongful death. It's been 25 years now and I don't remember the exact charge now. My uncle, Henry, testified on the behalf of the driver since he felt it was wrong to sue her. If she'd in any way been at fault, he wouldn't have taken the position he did. But he knew in his heart that it was a tragic accident and the woman punished herself more than any law ever could. To my knowlege, she's never driven since. She was in a psych ward for a long time.

    As a result, my uncle and his wife divorced. She was awarded a small sum by the courts. She took the kids, didn't allow my uncle or anyone on his side of the family to ever see the kids again. My uncle lost his whole family in just a split second and within 3 years after Nicky died, he committed suicide to be with the only child he could be with.

    The point I'm trying to make is this: It's a terrible tragedy. The pain and anguish is so great, too much to bear at times. For everyone concerned. You can't look down the road and see what will come of it all. In my uncle's case, the lawsuit cost him the most. I prefer to believe if Becky could have known the consequences of her choices, she'd have made a different one.

    Money won't erase the pain, the loss, the anguish. But the suit might lead to more tragedy, more pain, for more innocent people.

    I would hate to see one other human endure what my uncle and the lady driver endured.

    Today, little Nicky would have 26 years old. I wonder what kind of man he would have been. I wonder what kind of grandfather my uncle would have been.

    Please let this speak to you, to your heart.

    -- Posted by Queenie on Thu, Feb 25, 2010, at 9:25 PM
  • What happened to personal responsibility and common sense?

    Guess the driver didn't see the train, but now sees dollar signs.

    -- Posted by greenecounty21 on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 6:22 AM
  • Just because the driver was reckless and didn't stop for an oncoming train, does not give him the right to file suit against anyone. He should have acted a little more carefully,these kind of lawsuits make me sick!

    Hold your head up MR. Kaufman I know this must be hard for you after what you have been through.

    -- Posted by blacknwhite on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 10:44 AM
  • Perhaps had they STOPPED at the crossing as the STOP sign (quite visable) indicated, this accident would not have happened. Just maybe they are trying to appease THEIR guilt by accusing others???

    -- Posted by Sue62 on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 11:15 AM
  • I do not think this family is trying to get financial gain other than to pay the bills that I am sure has put stress on them . I think they are simply trying to make sure that another life is not lost due to unsafe railroad crossings. I think they are trying to make sure that something good comes out of their terrible situation.

    My heart goes out to this family .

    -- Posted by WANT SUM INFO on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 12:35 PM
  • Each railroad in Indiana shall maintain each public crossing under its control in such a manner that the operator of any licensed motor vehicle has an unobstructed view for 1,500 feet in both directions along the railroad right-of-way subject only to terrain elevations or depressions, track curvature, or permanent improvements. However, the Indiana Department of Transportation may adopt rules to adjust the distance of the unobstructed view requirement based on variances in train speeds, number of tracks, angles of highway and rail crossing intersections, elevations, and other factors consistent with accepted engineering practices.

    A public crossing equipped with a train-activated crossing gate is exempt from these requirements if the railroad maintains an unobstructed view for at least 250 feet in both directions along the railroad right-of-way.

    -- Posted by BillShields on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 1:13 PM
  • If anyone is interested in reading about railroad crossings, please look at the Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook at the following website.

    http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tfhrc/safety/pubs/86215/86215.pdf

    -- Posted by clairebear on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 1:46 PM
  • RIDICULOUS!!! The resposibility is that of the person driving the car. Stop at the stop signs and listen for the train whistle. You can clearly hear it from a mile away. Money compensation will not take away the pain. This lawsuit is just bringing back awful memories for the people who were innocently involved. Just goes to show that this world is all about money!!!

    -- Posted by speechless on Fri, Feb 26, 2010, at 2:32 PM
  • OK, I drive over both sets of railroad tracks on 500N west of SR59 multiple times a day, since I live on that road towards Dugger. Seems like they wasted all that money putting crossing arms on the WRONG set of tracks. I've NEVER seen a train go by on the east set -- only the west set (the tracks where there's just stop signs). Has anybody else? The only time I ever have a close encounter on that road, is when some IDIOT driver is approaching the top of the hill on the other side in MY lane...grrrr.

    -- Posted by IndiMa06 on Sun, Feb 28, 2010, at 1:45 PM
  • Maybe someone could clear this up for me...How can they legally sue the engineer if he was cleared of any wrong doing. Nothing he did caused the death of this child. I thought the law stated that as an individual, you are not responsible for the safety of another person. For this person to win this case, wouldn't they have to prove that Jesse had somehow been at fault in the accident??

    -- Posted by GirlyGirl21 on Wed, Mar 3, 2010, at 2:31 PM
  • O.J. Simpson won his criminal case and lost his civil suit case for the murder of his wife. If somebody can explain that, you should've been on th jury in the criminal case. I don't think they should sue this guy though. He accidentally killed a kid. I think that is harsh enough on him.

    -- Posted by DonCon on Wed, Mar 3, 2010, at 4:39 PM
  • This is such a sad case. I hate to hear that it is going to be drummed up again!

    -- Posted by Softball Coach on Fri, Mar 5, 2010, at 6:30 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: