[Nameplate] Fair ~ 54°F  
High: 71°F ~ Low: 54°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

Greene County Commissioners discuss courthouse safety

Friday, January 4, 2013

In light of the recent school shooting at a Connecticut elementary school and attacks in other public buildings across the nation, the Greene County Commissioners on Thursday morning agreed to take a close look at its courthouse building security policy and make changes, if necessary.

Commissioner's President Rick Graves suggested that a meeting be held with Courthouse Security Supervisor William "Butch" Brown and some of his staff, County Sheriff Terry Pierce, representatives from the court system and elected officials to find out if the building is safe enough, or if there are other things that can be done to make the building safer, including the idea of having someone who is armed on duty.

"What can we do to improve security, or security might be just fine. I don't know that. I just want be sure that we (the commissioners) have done all we can do to make it secure and make the elected officials and the courts feel safe while they are at work," Graves stated.

Commissioner Ed Michael said he felt like a review was a good idea.

"In this day and age, circumstances are going to happen. If we think it can't happen here, we didn't think we would have two deputies involved in a shooting (in July). It can happen anywhere," Michael said, "I think we are in a liability situation."

The idea of taking a closer look about the way security operates is also something that Commissioner Nathan Abrams supports.

"Public safety for our officeholders, even as far as our patrons, taxpayers are concerned. We need to be as safe as we can be," Abrams said.

Among the things being considered by the commissioners is increased security checks. Presently, officeholders, employees, delivery personnel and members of the media are exempt from the electronic walk-through or wand scans when they enter the courthouse.

Abrams was appointed as the commissioner's representative to set up discussions with the stakeholders and report back to the commissioners at the next meeting on Jan. 15 with his finding and possible recommendations.

In another change, the new commissioners dispensed with a long-standing tradition of requiring the sheriff or his representative to attend the twice-a-month commissioner's meeting and officially open the meetings.

Graves made a motion that was approved that no longer requests the presence of the sheriff at the meetings. The sheriff or any of the deputies could attend if they need to conduct business, but it will no longer be required.

"If it's convenient for them to attend, that's great, but if they have other things to do that's okay," Graves said.

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on gcdailyworld.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

The current setup is a concern. Current security is not armed and do not have the ability to respond to armed confrontation.

-- Posted by reality_check on Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 2:37 PM

Why aren't the employee's scanned also? all of the WVCF officers employee's are searched so to maximize security you should also be scanning the employee's & their belongings that they bring in with them. You never know if someone is having a bad day just may decide to clean house within their own office! I would be more afraid of the employee's than someone who I knew had gone thru the metal detectors.

Please don't get me wrong! I absolutely hate having to go thru the metal detectors! but the last time I had to go to the court house I just took my billfold in that way they didn't rummage thru my entire purse, just my billfold and beleive me they did! ... just to pay my taxes!

-- Posted by lillymae on Sat, Jan 5, 2013, at 12:47 PM

Apparently Congress isn't the only body of officials that exempt themselves from their own nuisance regulations. Can someone tell me why the courthouse officials are receiving this level of protection in the first place? Those lunatics who start shooting are just as liable to start in a school or a mall or whatever. If the general public is seen as the only danger, get these security people out of the court house and let them patrol the streets. Talk about a double standard.

-- Posted by ellis1 on Sat, Jan 5, 2013, at 4:07 PM

the gaurds ive seen had guns...and there was 3 of them...so waste more money on that dump of a court house...goverment is out of control with spending...plus how many courthouses have had a mass shooting???why dont u people do something worth the time u waste??

-- Posted by willam* on Sun, Jan 6, 2013, at 8:54 PM

There is NO ARMED SECURITY at the Greene County Courthouse. NONE. You know what an unarmed security officer is? A target. Employees not screened? Who is most likely to commit a crime in the workplace? An employee.

I suggest this: Suspend current courthouse security functions, and funnel that expense to the sheriff and require the sheriff to post law enforcement at the courthouse whenever it is opened to the public. Day or Night.

-- Posted by hmmph on Tue, Jan 8, 2013, at 6:44 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: