[Nameplate] Fair ~ 76°F  
High: 87°F ~ Low: 56°F
Sunday, July 13, 2014

Wall reinstated back to job with the Linton Fire Department by the Board of Works

Monday, January 21, 2013

Veteran Linton firefighter Kent D. "Opie" Wall is back on the job starting Tuesday morning.

Wall, who holds the rank of Captain and has been a member of the Linton Fire Department for more than 27 years, pleaded guilty to a class A misdemeanor charge of trespassing last week in Greene Superior Court.

The plea deal ended a judicial saga that started last summer on a lake in Greene-Sullivan State Forest and resulted in Wall being placed on administrative leave by the city on Aug. 13.

He was taken off the city's payroll Dec. 11.

Following his sentencing to the lesser misdemeanor charge, the Linton Board of Public Works convened for less than five minutes in a special session Monday morning to approve Wall's return to the Linton Fire Department at full pay.

Linton Mayor John Wilkes presided over the meeting and recommended Wall, who has been on the fire department since the fall of 1985, be reinstated.

Fellow Board of Public Works members Tony Richards and George Skeel joined the mayor in voting to send Wall back to work.

In shaking Wall's hand after the meeting adjourned, Richards told him, "I'm glad things worked out."

Wilkes said the city followed procedure and when the charge was reduced, it allowed the Board of Works to take Wall off of administrative leave.

"We have received from the court a plea agreement that takes Opie from being charged with a felony. He was convicted of trespass, which is a very minor incident. It's a class A misdemeanor," Wilkes said. "With that being done, the board can now reinstate him back to his job and that's what I would recommend."

Wilkes commented after the vote, "I'm just glad to have this behind us and glad that Opie is back (to work) and get things back to normal. It worked for the court the way it should work. We (as the city) did what we had to do according to the law and what was put before us."

After the meeting, Wall, who purchased one-acre on Richard Lake last year, said he didn't wish to elaborate on the incident, but said he was glad to be back to work.

"It (the incident) nearly ruined my life," he said of the incident, which he said lasted just two or three minutes.

The 50-year-old Wall was originally charged with intimidation involving a threat communicated to a law enforcement officer ---- a class D felony, and intimidation involving a threat made to another with the intent that they engage in conduct against their will ---- a class A misdemeanor.

The firefighter signed a negotiated plea agreement earlier this month with the prosecutor's office.

He was sentenced to 180 days in jail with all of the time suspended.

Under the terms of the negotiated plea agreement worked out between Wall's attorney, Joseph Lozano, of the Bloomington law firm of Shapiro & Lozano, and Greene County Deputy Prosecutor Keven McIntosh, both of the original counts were dismissed and Wall pleaded guilty to trespassing, a class A misdemeanor.

In addition to the suspended sentence, Wall was ordered by Greene Superior Court Judge Dena Martin to serve 60 hours of community service and pay a $35 fine plus court costs.

He will be on probation for 180 days on several terms and conditions including: While on probation, Wall may not carry or use a firearm or ammunition, and he may not operate a "SeaDoo" or similar watercraft, or allow the same to be operated on Richard Lake.

The criminal case against Wall was filed on July 19, 2012 following the incident on July 9 on Richard Lake in Greene-Sullivan State Forest.

Wall owns part of Richard Lake and other sections are owned by the State of Indiana and by Alvin and Doris Clark.

According to court records, Indiana Conservation Officer Michael Gregg allegedly was confronted by Wall after investigating reports of a 13-year-old boy trespassing on a personal watercraft that the boy was allegedly operating dangerously.

Gregg, while investigating, reportedly determined while Wall owned part of the lake, other sections were owned by the state and the Clarks.

The conservation officer, after seeing the teen, who was reportedly weaving the personal watercraft among the islands less than 50 feet from shore at high rates of speed, Gregg cited the teen's father, Brett Kramer, of Route 4, Linton.

Kramer was charged with criminal trespass ---- a class A misdemeanor. His case was settled Jan. 16 when he entered the pre-trial diversion program agreement.

The conservation officer also noted that the teen was allowed to operate the watercraft without a driver's license, a boater education card or direct adult supervision, according to the probable cause that was filed by Gregg.

The conservation officer also reportedly informed Wall and Kramer they could only operate on the part of the lake Wall owns, according to court records.

When Gregg went to the Clark's home, Kramer followed, riding his watercraft onto the property.

Gregg, accompanied by Linton Police Officer Chad Crynes, then arrested Kramer.

"At that time Kent Wall threatened bodily harm to the Clark family and myself," Gregg wrote in the probable cause, alleging that Wall told the conservation officer he needed to leave the property and not return without a warrant.

Staff Writer Anna Rochelle contributed to this report.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on gcdailyworld.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

This "special" treatment needs to stop, it is unfair to the average citizen.

-- Posted by dorindaJ on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 3:37 PM

Where's the special treatment?? He made a mistake and paid the price for it, why on earth should he not be given his job back. It had no bearing whatsoever on his ability to do his job just as well as he had the other 27 years.

-- Posted by Jrhall42 on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 4:56 PM

That's right Jrhall42! He made a mistake he is paying for it! If YOU did someone wrong dorindaJ you would want to have a job too CORRECT?! I would! What happened affected his job ZERO %!!! He does a great job and is a GREAT person!!

-- Posted by greenecountymom on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 5:23 PM

I was speaking of the final judgement, but what ev errr.

-- Posted by dorindaJ on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 6:10 PM

Welcome back!

-- Posted by greenetucky on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 8:22 PM

You can't keep a good man down

-- Posted by Bluetick_Hunter on Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 9:02 PM

Old miner, two words: maturity, professionalism

-- Posted by Jrhall42 on Tue, Jan 22, 2013, at 7:35 AM

I too think this was special treatment..I am sure that he is a good person, I have no problem with someone getting a second chance. I just think it should be a level playing field. There are people who get in trouble everyday and under their addiction and/or issues they are fine people also, yet I don't believe that this many people would jump to their defense even if they had paid the price for their mistake.

-- Posted by lintonite on Tue, Jan 22, 2013, at 12:27 PM

my opinion is.... maybe the lines of property needs to be more clear.... maybe everyone needs to be considerate of others... maybe everyone has learned a lesson and everyone else needs to get over it!!!

-- Posted by linton_resident on Tue, Jan 22, 2013, at 12:32 PM

OM, ever pull up on a serious accident only to find your family mbr involved? But continue to do the job, pretty much meets the definition of professionalism.

-- Posted by Jrhall42 on Tue, Jan 22, 2013, at 3:37 PM

Why does anyone think he received special treatment? Alot of cases are plea bargained down to lesser charges. It is not like Opie was offered a deal that is normally unheard of.

-- Posted by 0123 on Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 1:15 AM

I wasn't so much talking about the plea agreement, I was more thinking about the job. I think their are lots of people who deserve second chances and don't get them..it's not what you know, it's who you know.

-- Posted by lintonite on Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 2:54 PM

lintonite I don't understand your comment. He was put on administrative leave and was reinstated when the charges were reduced to a misdemeanor that is not unusual in fact that is protocol.

-- Posted by lillymae on Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 4:19 PM

3 months on the payroll...is that protocol???

-- Posted by willam* on Thu, Jan 24, 2013, at 12:08 AM

William*, My point exactly, Thank You!

-- Posted by lintonite on Thu, Jan 24, 2013, at 11:29 AM

If he had earned time off then yes it would be!

-- Posted by lillymae on Thu, Jan 24, 2013, at 11:37 AM

He shut the water off, right?

-- Posted by slaw on Thu, Jan 24, 2013, at 5:03 PM

lilymae, Doesn't say he took vacation or earned time off says he was put on administrative leave.

-- Posted by lintonite on Mon, Jan 28, 2013, at 3:19 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.